Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:46:39
Message-Id: 20130117194414.63766093@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by James Cloos
1 On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:35:12 -0500
2 James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote:
3 > >>>>> "CM" == Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> writes:
4 > CM> That's what's known as "doing it wrong". You should be querying
5 > CM> your package mangler for a list of categories, not doing an 'ls'.
6 >
7 > ls(1) isn't relevant. find(1) is. grep(1) is. There are others.
8 >
9 > Using the 'package managers' isn't very helpful. They generally do
10 > everything poorly. And usually **s*l*o*w*l*y**, if they compile at
11 > all.
12
13 On the other hand, they do things correctly, which your approach
14 doesn't.
15
16 > I can't even remember every time I've needed to use a regex, glob or
17 > other pattern match where the fact that the real categories had a dash
18 > made things easier and faster.
19
20 But wrong. If you want wrong answers quickly, cat /dev/urandom.
21
22 --
23 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>