| 1 |
2009/2/24 Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:19 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:25 -0600 |
| 5 |
> > Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Can we ban eclasses from setting EAPI? Is there any case where it |
| 7 |
> > > would be sane? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > It's already banned from a QA perspective, but from a package manager |
| 10 |
> > perspective people have done it in the past and possibly still do do |
| 11 |
> > it, and the spec doesn't forbid it. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> For what it's worth, no eclass in the gentoo-x86/eclass tree sets EAPI. |
| 15 |
> I don't know about anyplace else. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Regards, |
| 18 |
> Ferris |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 21 |
> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use slot |
| 24 |
deps. And I think that's a valid usage. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
1: |
| 27 |
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/lucene-contrib.eclass |
Archives