1 |
I can not speak for the gentoo project, but it would be silly to not include the rml patches (although I don't think of them as "fancy pants")... The rml preempt patch has been merged into the official Linux kernel anyway and thus will be part of *all* Linux distros in the not too distant future... |
2 |
|
3 |
Till then, you can always dl and apply the current patch yourself? |
4 |
|
5 |
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:29:26 +0100 |
6 |
Andreas Waschbuesch <awaschb@××××.de> wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
9 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Hi *, |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I just liked to ask, whether there will be those mr-fancy-pants preempt and |
14 |
> lockbreak patches from rml back in gentoo's actual kernel or not. I'd like to |
15 |
> switch from 2.4.17-r5 and will stick with vanilla + BOTH patches, if it's |
16 |
> clear that they won't be included in the nearer future - which would be quite |
17 |
> sad - by the way. Any plan? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Thanks in advance - Urs Andrew |
20 |
> |
21 |
> - -- |
22 |
> Andreas Waschbuesch, GAUniversity KG MA FNZ FK01 |
23 |
> eMail: awaschb@××××.de |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I think we're in trouble. |
26 |
> -- Han Solo |
27 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) |
29 |
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org |
30 |
> |
31 |
> iD8DBQE8jyoG2s5UCjOaQbYRAnxJAJ9vCwqBw5awwdBg4JfOpXOXeHDhYwCeP5HC |
32 |
> 9rBfwZvXzGuplXUtiAOZJ94= |
33 |
> =ZVee |
34 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
35 |
> _______________________________________________ |
36 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
37 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
38 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
39 |
> |