1 |
On Saturday 20 May 2006 22:47, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> The basic form of it, is a vulnerability towards a class of attacks that |
3 |
> require a large supply of signed/encrypted material. |
4 |
> For a primer on various modes of using block ciphers, see |
5 |
> Wikipedia: http://tinyurl.com/bbcmf |
6 |
> |
7 |
> It's conceivable that (and this is the absolute worst case), under this |
8 |
> class of attack, a lot of signing may ultimately reveal bits of your |
9 |
> key, because the attacker has both the plaintext and ciphertext, and can |
10 |
> ultimately compute it - this can either be brute-force, or |
11 |
> mathematically (consider it solving algebra). |
12 |
|
13 |
Once one developer has been compromised, there is even a chosen plaintext |
14 |
attack path. Making it even worse. |
15 |
|
16 |
Paul |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Paul de Vrieze |
20 |
Gentoo Developer |
21 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
22 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |