Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords - how can we help?
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:20:34
Message-Id: 20060727161637.GB4284@nibiru.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords - how can we help? by Steve Dibb
1 * Steve Dibb <beandog@g.o> schrieb:
2
3 <snip>
4
5 > That's actually how I read the first email, was that it's really the
6 > majority of the _minor_ packages that get completely neglected, and
7 > just sits in the tree for months or years marked unstable because
8 > nobody cares.
9
10 then the users probably didn't put enough preasure on the stabelizing
11 teams ;-P
12
13 As I suggested in my last mail: an tool which files stabelizing
14 requests for installed packages after some time (semi-)automatically
15 could help a lot.
16
17 Once I've got some spare time, I'll sit down and code something.
18 Anyone who likes to join me ?
19
20
21 cu
22 --
23 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
25 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
26 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
27 http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
28 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
29 http://patches.metux.de/
30 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list