1 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> posted |
2 |
20070325154636.5b75ddc1@snowflake, excerpted below, on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 |
3 |
15:46:36 +0100: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:40:51 -0400 |
6 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
>> On Saturday 24 March 2007, Matthias Langer wrote: |
8 |
>> > In my opinion, any project that has reasonable potential to improve |
9 |
>> > Gentoo as a whole |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> which doesnt apply here |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Did you not say that finding alternatives to Portage is one of Gentoo's |
14 |
> priorities? |
15 |
|
16 |
An equally likely meaning (and the one I read into it) is that it might |
17 |
benefit a particular segment of Gentoo users, but as it's not the |
18 |
currently default/official package manager, it'd be a relatively small |
19 |
segment, made proportionally even smaller by the fact that these bindings |
20 |
would at least in the near term impact an even smaller segment of /that/ |
21 |
segment. |
22 |
|
23 |
A segment of an already minor segment (certainly currently, tho that |
24 |
/may/ eventually change), not likely to be something that can reasonably |
25 |
be characterized as benefiting Gentoo as a whole, at least in the near to |
26 |
medium term, and beyond that, well, things remain up for grabs. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
30 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
31 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |