1 |
On 01/18/2016 12:03 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: |
2 |
> On 01/17/2016 15:03, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
>> Hello, everyone. |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> The current maintainer of net-fs herd so far hasn't replied to our |
6 |
>> queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding it |
7 |
>> and looking for new maintainers for its packages. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Is anyone interested in keeping the herd as a whole and maintaining all |
10 |
>> of its packages? If nobody replies till 2016-01-24, the herd will be |
11 |
>> automatically disbanded and I will be sending a complete list of |
12 |
>> packages needing maintainers. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Packages currently in herd along with their other maintainers: |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> [snip] |
18 |
> |
19 |
>> net-fs/ncpfs : |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I'll claim this one. I actually have several old NetWare VMs (3.x, 4.2) that I |
22 |
> can test this with from time-to-time, both TCP/IP and old IPX. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
>> net-fs/nfs4-acl-tools : |
26 |
>> net-fs/nfs-utils : |
27 |
>> net-nds/rpcbind : |
28 |
>> net-libs/libnfsidmap : |
29 |
> |
30 |
> base-system has portmap already, and given some run nfs as a root filesystem, I |
31 |
> wonder if base-system shouldn't cover these as well? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> --J |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
I'd like to help out as I use nfs as well, but don't think I can do it |
37 |
myself, just a user... |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |