Archives
Archives
| From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing | ||
| Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:10:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110929150957.GD704@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Manifest signing by "Anthony G. Basile" |
||
| 1 | On 29-09-2011 11:02:17 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 | > The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ... |
| 3 | > again. Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree |
| 4 | > are still not signed. Is there any chance that we can agree to reject |
| 5 | > unsigned manifests? Possibly a question for the Council to adjudicate? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Please refer to Mike's thread on this. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_7210bc8a18140db8f18ff89245efacd5.xml |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Fabian Groffen |
| 14 | Gentoo on a different level |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Manifest signing | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |