Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: grozin@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:02:54
Message-Id: 20140117160227.7853d878@pomiot.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy by grozin@gentoo.org
1 Dnia 2014-01-17, o godz. 14:02:51
2 grozin@g.o napisał(a):
3
4 > Maybe, a good solution is to introduce a special arch, "noarch", for such
5 > packages (similar to what's done in the rpm world). Then, if a package is
6 > ~noarch, it is automatically considered ~arch for all arches. Similar for
7 > stable. The maintainer should be able to keyword ~noarch and to stabilize
8 > noarch. Comments?
9
10 If you want to play with such a major change, you should start a new
11 thread instead of starting it in the middle of this spam-art.
12 Otherwise, many people will miss it and complain loudly afterwards.
13
14 --
15 Best regards,
16 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>