1 |
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Today I tried to boot latest install ISO (from January) and hit this |
4 |
> bug: |
5 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455924 |
6 |
> |
7 |
> This breaks a lot of hardware requiring firmwares (like some wireless |
8 |
> drivers) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Could a new ISO set be released? |
11 |
|
12 |
I'm working on it. |
13 |
The bug itself was fixed on catalyst some weeks ago (I still need to do a |
14 |
release with it, but our official box is using catalyst-9999 and has the |
15 |
fix). |
16 |
The 2 main issues with the stages and isos for the past 6 months have been |
17 |
developer time (I'm the one doing that work and haven't had as much free |
18 |
time) and the hardware hosting the official build box. |
19 |
The new buildbox has had a few hardware issues that have caused it to |
20 |
reboot while running the catalyst jobs. We also had a few issues with the |
21 |
tree that caused some build failures and the main reason why everyone is |
22 |
so interested in the new stages / isos, the recent major blocks affecting |
23 |
the tree, also caused issues for catalyst. |
24 |
|
25 |
In the meantime, anyone interested in new stages / isos, are free and |
26 |
welcome to test the ones built on my own server (using the official |
27 |
specs)[1]. |
28 |
|
29 |
About the complaints regarding the packages in the minmal cds, releng's |
30 |
position is that it should include the bare minimum to install Gentoo. |
31 |
That's why we're now creating admin-cds, that use a hardened kernel / |
32 |
toolchain and include a few useful tools (still no X, though)[2]. |
33 |
|
34 |
[1] - http://www.jmbsvicetto.name/releases/auto/ |
35 |
[2] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352152 |
36 |
|
37 |
> Thanks |
38 |
|
39 |
Regards, |
40 |
|
41 |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
42 |
|
43 |
PS - I still haven't fixed my Gentoo email setup, so I wasn't following |
44 |
this |
45 |
thread until someone hinted about it. |