Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: drobbins@g.o
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new package
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:28:52
Message-Id: 20010222102852.A22862@cvs.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] new package by AGottinger@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
1 On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:45:45PM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
2
3 > The only package that really needs care is ORBit. About 50 packages are in
4 > dev-perl. I personaly thought that using the sources name as we did it till
5 > now makes more sense since it reduces the typing in the scripts. But if you
6 > guys are not happy with that change it.
7
8 Yes, the reason why we have uppercase is because the original archive name /
9 source directory also has uppercase. This means that all the defaults get set
10 up correctly. For this reason alone, I think we should allow uppercase
11 characters in /usr/portage.
12
13 Exceptions:
14 If we are using uppercase for a package name, and the corresponding archive
15 or source directory doesn't use uppercase characters, then this should be
16 fixed so that we're using lowercase.
17
18 This helps me to understand why MacOS X added case insensitive file comparison
19 routines. Ideally, I'd like the filesystem to preserve the original case but
20 have:
21
22 # cat foo
23
24 and
25
26 # cat Foo
27
28 and
29
30 # cat fOo
31
32 ...cat the same file.
33
34 After all, "D" and "d" are both a "d". I'll see if I can track down a really
35 interesting message about this that I can forward to the list.
36
37 --
38 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
39 President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org
40 Gentoo Technologies, Inc.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] new package AGottinger@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)