Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:53:35
Message-Id: 20120623195413.37fd6507@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots by Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200 > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: > > > It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the > > > gtk3 version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of > > > "the gtk2 version" or "the ruby 1.8 version", just as it tries to > > > bring in a newer GCC and so on. > > > > And what problems is that causing for you? > > The problem is that there's no way of knowing that -r300 is not "a > newer version" than -r200
It is a newer version. That's why it has a newer revision.
> and that the jruby implementation is not "a > newer version" than the ruby 1.8 implementation.
And that's another thing which is ugly and should be replaced by something sane rather than worked around. -- Best regards, Michał Górny


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>