Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 04 Jul 2018 02:25:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38HvrOavQQSxgMe6tf6UHXtT=7NjcupAvQaOOC-Qb__tYw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync? by Matthias Maier |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:33 PM Matthias Maier <tamiko@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, at 11:22 CDT, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > > I'd be happy to switch if the space requirements were similar. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > $ git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > occupies 662M on my machine (just tested). With full history |
| 11 | > (i.e. without --depth=1) I am at 1.1GB. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Wait a week and emerge --sync again; it won't fit. |