| 1 |
В Птн, 19/12/2008 в 14:45 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: |
| 2 |
> If it reads (and presumably uncompresses) all of them at startup |
| 3 |
> anyway, what's the point in compressing them at all? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
It makes size smaller: both index and data files are text files so |
| 6 |
compression is very effective. All distributions I've checked compress |
| 7 |
data files, some compress both data and index. Probably all desktop |
| 8 |
users want dictionaries to be compressed because modern cpu's are really |
| 9 |
fast in decompression and even on my 4-years old notebook it takes less |
| 10 |
then second... But still there are environments where it's better to |
| 11 |
keep dictionaries uncompressed. That's why I want to keep this feature |
| 12 |
optional. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Peter. |
Archives