Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: tadpol@××××××.org
To: Hendrik Visage <hvisage@×××××××××××.za>
Cc: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix"
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 21:09:35
Message-Id: 20010808220836.B9737@tadpol.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix" by Hendrik Visage
1 On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:40:28AM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
2 > On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:33:48AM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
3 > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 09:05:57PM -0500, tadpol@××××××.org wrote:
4 > > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:04:22PM +0200, Hendrik Visage wrote:
5 > > > > The flwm -1.0 ebuild have a problem by not adding the
6 > > > > -lGL option to the Makefile's LIBS.
7 > Have to add: I somehow got the same results when doing a standard
8 > extract, ./configure & make also. Something that's laying around ?
9
10 same results meaning you had to patch the makefile?
11
12 this actually kinda looks like a package bug. My off hand guess is that
13 since fltk has optional support for opengl, the flwm author didn't build
14 support for it. This really should be soemthing configure detects
15 (something in the same maner as gtk-config --libs, something to get which
16 libs are needed for the fltk tool kit. since it is the what needs the gl
17 libs.)
18
19 hmmm. try something for me.
20
21 cd /usr/portage/x11-wm/flwm/
22 env X_EXTRA_LIBS=-lGL ebuild flwm-1.00.ebuild
23
24
25 if that works, I'll add stuff to the ebuild to look for the opengl USE tag.
26
27 later,
28 --
29 Michael Tilstra tadpol@××××××.org
30 Help support helpless victims of computer error.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] flwm ebuild "fix" tadpol@××××××.org