| 1 |
On 28/08/14 18:58, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2014-08-28, o godz. 00:37:48 |
| 3 |
> Micha³ Górny <mgorny@g.o> napisa³(a): |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> 3. ulm wants to reintroduce dohtml in an eclass for people who want to |
| 6 |
>> use it. I'd rather cover it with warnings signs and tell people not to |
| 7 |
>> touch it. IMHO a better replacement is the plain 'docinto html; dodoc |
| 8 |
>> -r ...', possibly with some extra filtering applied before or after |
| 9 |
>> install. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> What do you think? |
| 12 |
> One more thing came up on IRC: einstalldocs (and therefore the default |
| 13 |
> install function) installing README* that catches README.html as well. |
| 14 |
> I'd rather not add more dohtml-like magic and say it's fine. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I really dislike the whole default list of files defined for DOCS, I keep |
| 17 |
constantly adding empty DOCS="" to ebuilds to skip them |
| 18 |
I'd rather see whole list pruned empty, and let the maintainer |
| 19 |
decide which docs are actually useful |
Archives