| 1 |
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 31 May 2015 11:58, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
>> It might still be nice to adjust such packages for consistency, but it |
| 4 |
>> might be harder to justify patches to upstream developers. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> pkg-config already merged it and it's already been pulled back into Gentoo ;) |
| 7 |
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90078 |
| 8 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/550508 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> that said, i'm not entirely sure why there would be a lot of push back. |
| 11 |
> when i gathered data on this years ago (which i no longer have, so i'd have |
| 12 |
> to recreate), the increased foot print and runtime cost was not significant. |
| 13 |
> especially when you consider that we're talking about I/O operations which |
| 14 |
> inherently kill CPU performance due to stalls. |
| 15 |
> -mike |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sure, I don't really expect much resistance. I just like to be |
| 18 |
prepared in the event some developer starts asking questions. |
Archives