| 1 |
Alexis Ballier schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:32:56 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> As the topic says, when someone converts an ebuild to multilib, please |
| 6 |
>> dont disable binary building for other ABIs, as has already been done |
| 7 |
>> for some packages. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> This will break e.g. for users who target 64bit toolchain and 32bit |
| 10 |
>> userland, since those would not get any binaries from building for |
| 11 |
>> none-default ABIs. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> - submit a patch against multilib_is_native_abi for those corner cases |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
huh? Please tell me, how a changed multilib_is_native_abi function would |
| 17 |
help here. Either you restrict something to native abi or you dont, |
| 18 |
having a check telling you "true - we are either native abi or not" is |
| 19 |
not really usefull, is it? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> - fill bugs and patches for ebuilds disabling it by other means |
| 22 |
> (there are because this function didnt exit at the beginning) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
see above |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> no, we won't be building useless stuff to throw it away one |
| 29 |
> minute later, thanks for the bloat. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
We already do it in many cases, just take complete package rebuilds due |
| 32 |
to USE flag changes. Having some more lines compiled wont kill your |
| 33 |
computer, but will allow people to use their own target setup. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
If you really care about building something, you should know, that |
| 36 |
Gentoo is not the right place to complain about. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Thomas Sachau |
| 42 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives