1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Mon Oct 10 2005, 04:43:19PM CDT] |
2 |
> Isn't the idea that someone writes out a draft GLEP and gets it |
3 |
> discussed on -dev (and repeats said process until everyone is happy |
4 |
> with the GLEP) *before* pushing things to the council? |
5 |
|
6 |
I disagree, but only very slightly. I never expected everybody to be |
7 |
happy before a GLEP is voted upon, but a GLEP should address areas of |
8 |
controversy and either incorporate the new ideas or explain why the |
9 |
authors do not wish to do so. In this way the folks voting on the GLEP |
10 |
are able to make a more informed decision. See GLEP 40 for an example. |
11 |
|
12 |
-g2boojum- |
13 |
-- |
14 |
Grant Goodyear |
15 |
Gentoo Developer |
16 |
g2boojum@g.o |
17 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
18 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |