| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 07/01/2013 06:20 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 07/01/2013 10:41 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> What does a patch introducing new features really do? Or rather, |
| 8 |
>> what should it do when we add it? Let me summarize: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> 1) The features should be disabled by default. 2) These feature |
| 11 |
>> should depend on a non-vanilla / experimental option. |
| 12 |
> If users want a vanilla kernel, they want vanilla-sources. |
| 13 |
> Nothing about that should change. I don't feel that it would be |
| 14 |
> honest to add a vanilla use flag to gentoo-sources as in no reality |
| 15 |
> are those vanilla. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Agreed, some of this sounds interesting (although I don't care as a |
| 19 |
user), but whatever you do... don't mess with vanilla-sources. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I stopped using gentoo-sources, because some random hacks broke some |
| 22 |
network drivers once and I don't want a hackjob on vanilla-sources... |
| 23 |
optional or not. |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR0a5AAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzf4wIAIhfHvIJmqU3jfIVvGlNL5QR |
| 29 |
Z8SM4jyw95ehtTMWDdpnEdLUuW7yu8pK9K9N9cXSchvQ3GJfjxJTI/v7RSI+WPBN |
| 30 |
NrTgfKYF1KGg6jNQXjuiyG5QwV9faE7zEZ8unDRyxX0EhWyiWACjuSzBdpzS6Nhm |
| 31 |
QcDCEzzuXNtPR44pqfDQ3DqqRU+aUAE7juM+Yd146x3CFDE8vvVuvuGYnXhVczQ8 |
| 32 |
vkfdqLNLMamIROWapV4HG8p2NOzDbPjbUcMB7uBsP8DPm/HjOQRNxyY0yCD38hq3 |
| 33 |
4RJFZz7RPTjWQ2p8PacHKZ4Rye6EY7W/x6JTVqmh3zbc+6tm6q7kKtMyn1L03Bw= |
| 34 |
=ds3y |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives