1 |
> On 19 Jun 2022, at 11:03, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Hi, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Here's a patchset doing two things: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> 1. Restructuring s390 profiles so that s390 and s390x trees are more |
8 |
> independent, and top-level arch/s390 includes only common stuff. |
9 |
> This avoids the current ping-pong of masking stuff in s390 just |
10 |
> to unmask it in s390x. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 2. Adding a common "feature" profile (i.e. effectively a mixin) |
13 |
> common to architectures (and subprofiles) that aren't supported |
14 |
> by Rust. This saves us from duplicating the same (or a little |
15 |
> different) masks all over the place. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> This patch series can also be found on MicrosoftⓇ GitHubⓇ: |
18 |
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25951 |
19 |
|
20 |
I need to review the details just to check for any errors (and I'll do that now), |
21 |
but conceptual ACK, and unless you hear otherwise, LGTM. |
22 |
|
23 |
And I like the name (wd40). It's a nice bit of Gentoo "personality" |
24 |
which some folks say we're lacking nowadays ;) |
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks for working on this. It'll make life a lot easier for the |
27 |
platforms which aren't support Rust. Might even make it easier |
28 |
to "support" systems w/o e.g. SSE2. |
29 |
|
30 |
(For non-technical observers: this is an internal mechanism |
31 |
to allow easily referencing "no Rust" settings, rather than |
32 |
creating a profile for users to actually easily opt in to |
33 |
removing Rust. Although in theory you may add it to |
34 |
a custom profile and add it as a parent.) |
35 |
|
36 |
Best, |
37 |
sam |