Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sam James <sam@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] s390 restructuring + common mixin for arches without Rust
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 01:56:16
Message-Id: 4970D8FF-3679-4B9F-88E4-6303D744664F@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] s390 restructuring + common mixin for arches without Rust by "Michał Górny"
1 > On 19 Jun 2022, at 11:03, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > Hi,
4 >
5 > Here's a patchset doing two things:
6 >
7 > 1. Restructuring s390 profiles so that s390 and s390x trees are more
8 > independent, and top-level arch/s390 includes only common stuff.
9 > This avoids the current ping-pong of masking stuff in s390 just
10 > to unmask it in s390x.
11 >
12 > 2. Adding a common "feature" profile (i.e. effectively a mixin)
13 > common to architectures (and subprofiles) that aren't supported
14 > by Rust. This saves us from duplicating the same (or a little
15 > different) masks all over the place.
16 >
17 > This patch series can also be found on MicrosoftⓇ GitHubⓇ:
18 > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25951
19
20 I need to review the details just to check for any errors (and I'll do that now),
21 but conceptual ACK, and unless you hear otherwise, LGTM.
22
23 And I like the name (wd40). It's a nice bit of Gentoo "personality"
24 which some folks say we're lacking nowadays ;)
25
26 Thanks for working on this. It'll make life a lot easier for the
27 platforms which aren't support Rust. Might even make it easier
28 to "support" systems w/o e.g. SSE2.
29
30 (For non-technical observers: this is an internal mechanism
31 to allow easily referencing "no Rust" settings, rather than
32 creating a profile for users to actually easily opt in to
33 removing Rust. Although in theory you may add it to
34 a custom profile and add it as a parent.)
35
36 Best,
37 sam

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature