Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:28:49
Message-Id: 200601261626.15067.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Thursday 26 January 2006 16:08, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 > It prints about 10X of crap like this:
3 >
4 > virtual/libc !virtual/xemacs berkdb? ( =sys-libs/db-1*
5 > >=sys-libs/gdbm-1.8.0 ) >=sys-libs/zlib-1.1.4 >=dev-libs/openssl-0.9.6
6 > >=media-libs/audiofile-0.2.3 gpm? ( >=sys-libs/gpm-1.19.6 ) postgres? (
7 > >=dev-db/postgresql-7.2 ) ldap? ( net-nds/openldap ) nas? (
8 > media-libs/nas ) dnd? ( x11-libs/dnd ) X? ( virtual/x11 ) motif? (
9 > >=x11-libs/openmotif-2.1.30 ) athena? ( virtual/x11 ) Xaw3d? (
10 > x11-libs/Xaw3d ) neXt? ( x11-libs/neXtaw ) xface? ( media-libs/compface
11 > ) tiff? ( media-libs/tiff ) png? ( =media-libs/libpng-1.2* ) jpeg? (
12 > media-libs/jpeg ) canna? ( app-i18n/canna ) !amd64? ( freewnn? (
13 > app-i18n/freewnn ) ) >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.2 !bootstrap? ( sys-devel/patch )
14
15 This was testing/debugging left in by mistake.
16
17 > Then doesn't print the one line saying
18 > "app-editors/xemacs/xemacs-21.4.15-r3.ebuild: RDEPEND has deprecated x11
19 > dependencies" without a "full" listing? That doesn't make sense -- if it
20 > has to be one way or the other, it should be the reverse.
21
22 That's a standard repoman thing. Details are only printed if there are less
23 than 12 occurrences of a specific warning unless "repoman full" is run. Not
24 sure why it wasn't being displayed if there was only one occurrence.
25
26 The patch now has the debugging output and x11-base/xorg-x11 check removed.
27
28 --
29 Jason Stubbs
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>