1 |
It is a moot point because I do not think this project idea is feasible. |
2 |
|
3 |
On Mar 12, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>> Things that provide us with improvements over what we have are |
7 |
>> definitely worth consideration as GSoC projects. However, what is |
8 |
>> accepted ultimately depends on not only feedback from a potential |
9 |
>> mentor, but also a vote of Gentoo developers. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Honestly, this seems like a less-than-ideal fit for Gentoo. We don't |
12 |
> really use ZFS at all, other than as yet another package in our tree. |
13 |
> Any of the Mozilla/ GSoC ideas would make as much sense to deliver as |
14 |
> part of the Gentoo GSoC. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Now, if this were about integrating auto-snapshots into the package |
17 |
> manager, (like can be done with snapper), etc, then I could see more |
18 |
> relevance (though it probably wouldn't rise to a full project). I |
19 |
> could also see some kind of project to integrate advanced filesystem |
20 |
> features into core elements of our distro across many filesystems |
21 |
> (though I don't really see the relevance for reflinks in particular, |
22 |
> and they only apply to COW filesystems anyway). |
23 |
> |
24 |
> This just seems like a ZFS project, and not like a Gentoo project. |
25 |
> I'd say the same if this were about adding a mute button to tabs in |
26 |
> Chromium, or fixing the offline btrfsck, or whatever. All of those |
27 |
> things would be useful to Gentoo, but only insofar as they'd be useful |
28 |
> to anybody. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Rich |
31 |
> |