1 |
On 20 Jun 2003 18:06:08 +0200 |
2 |
Philippe Lafoucrière <lafou@×××××××.fr> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Yes, I've red it. But I saw nothing concrete since that. :( |
5 |
|
6 |
There wasn't really a lot of feedback to my suggestion, so I thought |
7 |
nobody is interested (at least until there is some code to look at)... |
8 |
|
9 |
> Pythondialiog (available in portable) in a very cool product. But I |
10 |
> want to do a sys util. It must run with the minimum packages. |
11 |
> (Although, python is available in miminal installation, since portage |
12 |
> using it.). |
13 |
|
14 |
I also went with Pythondialog (which btw works fine here, no problems |
15 |
like described in your other mail), it's ok, but just covers the basic |
16 |
features of Dialog. Things like relabeling buttons etc. are missing. |
17 |
|
18 |
> Moreover, pythondialog ebuild is buggy : |
19 |
|
20 |
As stated above, it worked for me, but I already had quite a lot of |
21 |
Tcl/Tk stuff installed (for Tkabber). |
22 |
|
23 |
> Should we use python + dialog, or only "shell" dialog ? An advantage |
24 |
> of using python would be the use of portage package |
25 |
> (haven't thought about that). |
26 |
|
27 |
The use portage was actually the reason for me to go with Python. |
28 |
BUT I've never done anything substantially more difficult the "Hello |
29 |
World" (ok, I did a little more, but no much) in Python, so this project |
30 |
was also intended as a way to teach me the language. |
31 |
|
32 |
Sending you the script as it is right now would be of little use, it's |
33 |
jsut a little something getting me started in Python. |
34 |
|
35 |
As I said, after my exams are finished I have more time for this... |
36 |
|
37 |
Michael |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
www.cargal.org |
41 |
GnuPG-key-ID: 0x90CA09E3 |
42 |
Jabber-ID: citizen428 [at] cargal [dot] org |
43 |
Registered Linux User #278726 |