| 1 |
On Sunday 10 April 2005 7:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:44:19 +0200 Christian Parpart <trapni@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | So, sooner or shorter, we're announcing here some news on |
| 6 |
> | this subject (oops, did I already by this?, so, I can say, |
| 7 |
> | we're offering already existing svn repositories to be |
| 8 |
> | merged into the gentoo svn repository |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Hrm, please tell me you're planning one svn repo per 'project', not one |
| 11 |
> huge big Gentoo svn repo. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Both have pros and cons. Well, the ASF has everyting converted into a single |
| 14 |
repository and they seem to be just lucky with it. KDE is about to convert |
| 15 |
everything into a single svn repos as well (for other reasons). |
| 16 |
For the Gentoo projects, it might make sense (administrative) to keep |
| 17 |
everything into a single repository as well. However, providing each sub |
| 18 |
project with its own repository will work around the single-point-of-failure |
| 19 |
effect (in worst case) so it's likely to happen this way. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
However, it's not likely to happen today or tomorrow, like ramereth said. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
be patient ;) |
| 24 |
Christian Parpart. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt |
| 28 |
20:17:34 up 18 days, 9:23, 0 users, load average: 0.76, 0.80, 0.72 |
Archives