| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:46:36PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> seems like a virtual that wouldn't do anything useful except pull in |
| 4 |
>> random package(s) a la binary-distribution style |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> What about the stages? Don't we need some form of net support in |
| 7 |
> stage 3? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
That's debatable. For a typical install, the user has to install other |
| 11 |
basic stuff like a boot loader, kernel, etc. So having them also |
| 12 |
select a network config framework seems logical. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Is there a use case for a stage3 in which installing netifrc by hand |
| 15 |
is impractical? |
Archives