1 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 19:27:02 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Long story short, this is USE=gtk once again. GNOME team had a |
3 |
> policy that handled the case cleanly and QA outvoted it in favor of |
4 |
> Qt-like policy. Then Qt team figured out their policy was unfriendly, |
5 |
> and 'fixed' it with this ugly hack... |
6 |
> |
7 |
> As I see it, this is a major failure of using toolkit-version oriented |
8 |
> flags rather than feature-oriented flags. Possibilities compared: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> USE='qt4 qt5' without ^^ is easy to set since it is free of REQUIRED_USE |
11 |
> issues. However, it's ugly: USE='qt4 qt5' may now mean either both |
12 |
> toolkits or one of them. In the latter case, we have two flag |
13 |
> combinations (= two different binary packages) that mean the same. |
14 |
> Additionally, USE='-qt4 -qt5' may mean both none of them or one of |
15 |
> them. If the latter, yet another case of redundant binary package. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> USE='qt4 qt5' with ^^/?? is cleaner from user perspective and better |
18 |
> for binary packages. However, it may mean that user will have to |
19 |
> randomly adjust flags per-package. Which may end up sucking even more |
20 |
> with new Qt versions being introduced and package.use being full of |
21 |
> random '-qt4' and stuff. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> What would be really clean is USE='qt qt5' (or 'qt qt4'), alike GNOME |
24 |
> team policy. USE=qt would mean 'any version of Qt, if optional', and |
25 |
> qt4/qt5 would be used to switch between Qt4/Qt5. If Qt would be |
26 |
> obligatory, no USE=qt would apply. If only one Qt version would be |
27 |
> supported, no USE=qt4/qt5 would apply. Clean, sane and limited |
28 |
> package.use cruft. |
29 |
|
30 |
This is a clean solution for developers and maintainers, but not |
31 |
for ordinary users — they will confused by "qt qt4 qt5": "what is |
32 |
'qt', how is it different from 'qt4' and 'qt5'. What you are really |
33 |
doing is implementing second-level USE flags, while they were |
34 |
supposed to be linear. |
35 |
|
36 |
> However, as you can see QA has previously outvoted the clean policy for |
37 |
> USE=gtk. I don't see why it would decide otherwise for USE=qt*. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> Best regards, |
41 |
> Michał Górny |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
Best regards, |
45 |
Andrew Savchenko |