| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 5 |
| What I see with Gentoo is this 'cathedral' being built where only those |
| 6 |
| folks who have been 'approved' or 'blessed' as being l33t enough are |
| 7 |
| allowed to review the code and actually cause a positive change when |
| 8 |
| some bug is found. If you believe Chris Gianelloni's argument, then only |
| 9 |
| those blessed developers who are also blessed by a particular group |
| 10 |
| within Gentoo are allowed. Eventually the meritocracy degrades into a |
| 11 |
| popularity contest. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Our code is all available in the portage tree or ViewCVS, and so are all |
| 14 |
the ebuild bugs in Bugzilla. Nobody's stopping anybody else from |
| 15 |
reviewing any submissions or filing new bugs. It's just a question of |
| 16 |
who makes (and therefore approves of) the actual commit. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I don't see where your cathedral is coming from. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Donnie |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iD8DBQFDCFE8XVaO67S1rtsRAus4AJ9KFE6sGcSR+zOcWHMcvSSi3y6nPwCbB6ZG |
| 26 |
J3Tkx0jpntLr+B7fPy5RQfw= |
| 27 |
=mLzH |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives