| 1 |
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:39:10 -0500 |
| 2 |
Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
> > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: |
| 6 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest files be |
| 9 |
> signed like the current ones? Would it be possible to have "per-line" |
| 10 |
> signing, or something like the stacked signing idea that was proposed |
| 11 |
> last month. If we are going to change the manifest format, might as |
| 12 |
> well do it properly. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the |
| 15 |
questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size |
| 16 |
reduction). And so far I haven't seen any sufficient answer to |
| 17 |
questions I raised on -core and -portage-dev regarding the |
| 18 |
transaction/stacked/fragmented/whatever-you-want-to-call-it Manifest |
| 19 |
signing proposed by Robin, so I'm still quite against it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Marius |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 27 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives