| 1 |
On Friday 19 May 2006 09:33, Roy Marples wrote: |
| 2 |
> Maybe you haven't noticed, but baselayout is a virtual - which does make |
| 3 |
> things harder as the main "forks" (vserver and fbsd) sometimes break when |
| 4 |
> we add new things and they haven't synced up yet. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I have nothing against a virtual. I just don't think polluting the profile |
| 7 |
subtree with alternative package mananger stuff is good idea. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> But that's OK as they're supported I guess. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Or are you saying that spb, other devs and people outside of Gentoo who has |
| 12 |
> submitted SoC applications about Paludis (or what that qaludis?) are just |
| 13 |
> going to wack it into the tree and then say "we're not going to support |
| 14 |
> it"? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Of course not! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
No, I'm saying it's not the Gentoo package manager. Work on it, make it a |
| 19 |
viable contender for replacing Portage, but as long it isn't, keep it in an |
| 20 |
overlay. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Carsten |
Archives