1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:10 +0000, Steve Long wrote: |
3 |
> > I don't know how it would work technically, how difficult it would |
4 |
> > be, or indeed if anyone is prepared to do the work, besides maybe |
5 |
> > some of the users. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> No. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Once we have USE-based dependencies across the board, then yes. Until |
10 |
> that time, we should really be building both client and server for |
11 |
> *all* packages. The *only* reason one should not be doing this is if |
12 |
> they're following the definition of minimal, or it is not possible to |
13 |
> build both the client and the server at the same time. |
14 |
|
15 |
Where can I learn more about the progress of this USE-based |
16 |
dependencies feature? I couldn't find an appropriate GLEP -- only |
17 |
bug 2272 [1] seemed relevant, and it doesn't mention what (if anything) |
18 |
is actually being done to get this into portage... Or is it just |
19 |
waiting on the definition of EAPI=0 to be complete so it can be added |
20 |
to EAPI=1? |
21 |
|
22 |
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Jim Ramsay |
26 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) |