1 |
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:48:45 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| > Take it out of package.mask and leave it for thirty |
4 |
| > (package-dependent) days. If there is a pressing (eg security) |
5 |
| > reason for it to go to stable sooner than would normally be |
6 |
| > expected, file a bug and Cc: the relevant arch teams. |
7 |
| |
8 |
| I was thinking more like signalling that it shouldn't be stable yet, |
9 |
| but shouldn't be masked either. |
10 |
|
11 |
Well, if it's in ~arch it's a candidate to go to stable after further |
12 |
testing. If a package maintainer isn't prepared to have a package moved |
13 |
to stable, they shouldn't take it out of package.mask. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
17 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
18 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |