Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:46:30
Message-Id: 20070225134331.GA805556@lion.gg3.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? by Georgi Georgiev
1 maillog: 25/02/2007-22:38:54(+0900): çÅÏÒÇÉ çÅÏÒÇÉÅ× types
2 > maillog: 25/02/2007-13:53:18(+0100): Andrej Kacian types
3 > > On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:43:10 +0200
4 > > Samuli Suominen <drac@g.o> wrote:
5 > >
6 > > > What do YOU think about removing these from tree?
7 > > >
8 > > > gtk-engines/gtk-engines-0.12.ebuild:DEPEND="=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2*
9 > > > gtk-engines-begtk/gtk-engines-begtk-1.0.1-r2.ebuild:DEPEND="=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2*"
10 > > [snip]
11 > >
12 > > As long as we have GTK+-1.2 in the tree, I'd rather keep them in.
13 >
14 > I think that was sort of the point.
15 > Did you see that last one in the list. :)
16
17 Ooops, my wrong, it was all bad wrapping. I should really stop rushing
18 replies.
19
20 --
21 (* Georgi Georgiev (* Zapp: You win again, gravity! (*
22 *) chutz@×××.net *) *)
23 (* http://www.gg3.net/ (* (*
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list