| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 07/17/2013 04:57 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
> I know there was an announcement about the upcoming change to |
| 6 |
> cmake-utils.eclass, however... it is not enough to give a deadline |
| 7 |
> without caring if people actually fixed it by then. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> By doing that you risk breaking stable packages which is not |
| 10 |
> trivial. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You _must_ do a tinderbox run, test that stuff in an overlay or |
| 13 |
> whatever. You are responsible for ALL reverse deps. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The way it was done... was not appropriate. Please be more careful |
| 16 |
> next time. There are still incoming bugs about broken base_src_* |
| 17 |
> calls. (see the tracker) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I discussed this with hasufell on IRC, but I'll lay out the response |
| 21 |
on the list too. Yes, this was my fault. We (KDE team) tested in our |
| 22 |
overlay, but none of the packages there use the base_src_* calls, |
| 23 |
which is why it didn't come up in testing, and I did not realize that |
| 24 |
there were packages that did rely on the implicit base inherit to call |
| 25 |
base_src_* directly. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Chris Reffett |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iKYEARECAGYFAlHnCfVfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl |
| 33 |
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM2NzU5RjUyMDczREJDQkVDQTBDRkE1NERC |
| 34 |
Nzk1QThBNDI2MTgzNTQACgkQ23laikJhg1T6ZACcC5cDNBCODxrnzlPCTm+L4EgS |
| 35 |
wCkAniqjyBFXhIXeXyb0Wbvufkbw68yS |
| 36 |
=QM3o |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives