Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:46:17
Message-Id: pan.2009.09.01.05.54.33@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) by Sebastian Pipping
1 Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
2
3 > However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
4 > introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That would
5 > be transparent and use existing means.
6
7 I've always thought Gentoo needed "plus" versions of the versioned
8 licenses, anyway. GPL-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3, and GPL-3+, should all be
9 different licenses, because really, they are.
10
11 Then again, there's the various "waiver" conditions, which I /do/ see are
12 covered with separate licenses for many of them, already.
13
14 But someone already mentioned a license audit, which in practical terms
15 would be needed to really depend on the LICENSE variable in any case.
16
17 --
18 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
19 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
20 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Add operator + for licenses (EAPI-4 ?) Mounir Lamouri <volkmar@g.o>