Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:57:05
Message-Id: 20070304155716.7b7487e2@c1358217.kevquinn.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting by Daniel Robbins
1 On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:17:56 -0700
2 "Daniel Robbins" <drobbins.daniel@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > So, again, since you are participating as a key member in an official
5 > Gentoo project, which is a developer-only privilege, you should either
6 > have your dev access reinstated or be removed from the project.
7
8 This is incorrect. The full implication here is that only devs can
9 contribute significantly to Gentoo - which would be a big backwards
10 step, and something we have gone through a fair amount of heart-ache to
11 avoid. We have evolved various ways in which users can contribute
12 valuable work; not just by posting into bugzilla (which was the only
13 mechanism available when I joined, shortly after you left I think) but
14 also working alongside "proxy devs", or working in with devs in
15 overlays, working as Arch Testers and so on. Personally I work with
16 several people who are not Gentoo devs, but are _critically_ important
17 to the work that I do for Gentoo. After all, although we call
18 ourselves developers, really we're integrators.
19
20 Today, being a dev (which essentially means having commit access
21 to Gentoo repositories) is mostly about taking responsibility for what
22 is finally committed.
23
24 --
25 Kevin F. Quinn

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting Martin Jackson <mjolnir@g.o>