1 |
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:17:56 -0700 |
2 |
"Daniel Robbins" <drobbins.daniel@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> So, again, since you are participating as a key member in an official |
5 |
> Gentoo project, which is a developer-only privilege, you should either |
6 |
> have your dev access reinstated or be removed from the project. |
7 |
|
8 |
This is incorrect. The full implication here is that only devs can |
9 |
contribute significantly to Gentoo - which would be a big backwards |
10 |
step, and something we have gone through a fair amount of heart-ache to |
11 |
avoid. We have evolved various ways in which users can contribute |
12 |
valuable work; not just by posting into bugzilla (which was the only |
13 |
mechanism available when I joined, shortly after you left I think) but |
14 |
also working alongside "proxy devs", or working in with devs in |
15 |
overlays, working as Arch Testers and so on. Personally I work with |
16 |
several people who are not Gentoo devs, but are _critically_ important |
17 |
to the work that I do for Gentoo. After all, although we call |
18 |
ourselves developers, really we're integrators. |
19 |
|
20 |
Today, being a dev (which essentially means having commit access |
21 |
to Gentoo repositories) is mostly about taking responsibility for what |
22 |
is finally committed. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Kevin F. Quinn |