Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:33:02
Message-Id: 20070412102830.18f50676@sed-192.sedsystems.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > If something's supposed to be transparent, it shouldn't be on -core.
3 > And, conversely, if something's on -core, it's not supposed to be
4 > transparent. Opening up -core just makes it harder to handle those
5 > rare cases where things really are required to be restricted.
6
7 I agree - this is precisely the reason why I personally prefer a private
8 archive of -core.
9
10 > There's also the issue of whether this can legitimately be made
11 > retroactive. As Ned already pointed out, some developers only posted
12 > things to -core because they believed that it was not public.
13
14 I'm fairly sure the consensus is that this would not be retroactive.
15
16 --
17 Jim Ramsay
18 Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature