Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Minor kde2 ebuilds needed?
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:25:32
Message-Id: 200212142202.46362.danarmak@gentoo.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hello,
5
6 Some time ago I closed bug #6897 as WONTFIX. It was an ebuild submission for a
7 kde2-only app (ie the project seems dead). There is also bug #10318, which is
8 also for an ebuild for a minor kde2 app. Seeing two similar bugs close
9 together prompted this letter.
10
11 An app having no kde3 release, in fact no new release since kde 3.0 itself was
12 released last January (as is the case with the above two), is for the most
13 part a sign of the project being dead or dormant. Which is an argument
14 against having an ebuild in portage. Although, in most cases I suppose
15 upstream would still at least accept bugfixes etc.
16
17 Also for me maintaining kde2 apps isn't fun. I don't have kde2 installed all
18 the time, and I wouldn't enjoy dealing with problems in it that aren't
19 present in kde3. I've a committment to Gentoo beyond enjoying myself, so if
20 the community wants such ebuilds, I'll add them.
21
22 So I'm asking our users & other developers for their opinion on this. Are
23 there any objections to not adding kde2 app ebuilds (of course there might be
24 exceptions for important stuff, but as a general rule) on these grounds? Does
25 anyone want such stuff?
26
27 As a followup question: who uses kde 2.2.2 at all on Gentoo, and why? I don't
28 propose removing kde2 and existing kde2 app ebuilds from portage, I'm just
29 curious.
30
31 (I'm not posting on gentoo-user because I'm not subscribed there; someone
32 please forward this there, we might as well have a big discussion as possible
33 and close this issue once and for all.)
34
35 - --
36 Dan Armak
37 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
38 Matan, Israel
39 Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
40 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
41 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
42
43 iD8DBQE9+45mUI2RQ41fiVERAukgAJ9SXUJGzTKNB3DQkVS9SZmu85xQAwCgg68e
44 O4vyvWZoRRadWC+A3G1+xJg=
45 =p4g3
46 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
47
48
49 --
50 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor kde2 ebuilds needed? Paul de Vrieze <gentoo-user@××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor kde2 ebuilds needed? Troy Dack <tad@g.o>