| 1 |
Mike Frysinger posted on Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:42:43 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> we've got pretty good USE=readline coverage now, and there's nothing |
| 4 |
> this provides in terms of utility programs that means we need this to be |
| 5 |
> explicitly listed in the profile as a system package. so time to drop |
| 6 |
> it. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Um... package, or USE flag? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You mention the USE flag but then say the package, but don't mention the |
| 11 |
category in either the subject or body, which again tilts toward the USE |
| 12 |
flag as it's bare, while the package normally comes with a category, |
| 13 |
particularly given that there are two such packages in the tree so the |
| 14 |
package name alone is ambiguous. But since there's two packages and a |
| 15 |
USE flag and there's reasons to argue one way but you specifically said |
| 16 |
the other, which is ambiguous on its own, it's doubly ambiguous! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 20 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 21 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives