Archives
Archives
| From: | Jochen Maes <SeJo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.1 released | ||
| Date: | Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:26:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4489C955.8030102@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.1 released by Chris Gianelloni |
||
| 1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 | Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 | > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 11:12 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 6 | >> Portage-2.1 final is released, |
| 7 | >> |
| 8 | >> RELEASE-NOTES[1] NEWS[2] BUGS-FIXED[3] STABLIZING BUG[4] |
| 9 | >> |
| 10 | >> |
| 11 | [1]http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES?view=markup |
| 12 | >> |
| 13 | >> |
| 14 | [2]http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/NEWS?view=markup |
| 15 | >> [3]http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115839 |
| 16 | >> [4]http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136198 |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | > So like... should we put up a news item about this? I think so. |
| 19 | > After all, it is good PR when something as major as this happens. |
| 20 | > |
| 21 | indeed we should do this. |
| 22 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 | Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 | |
| 25 | iD8DBQFEiclUMXMsRNMHhmARAqquAKCDOj/tdftL6EvPsXplSGYhQwVPnwCg8Khr |
| 26 | aZlG4knJs4fseveWBWispXM= |
| 27 | =oJwv |
| 28 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 | |
| 30 | -- |
| 31 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.1 released | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |