| 1 |
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:49:50 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Michał, as already discussed with Pacho [1], emul-linux-x86-jna can |
| 5 |
> > just go away entirely. Nothing requires it and it doesn't make any |
| 6 |
> > sense without emul-linux-x86-java though I note that isn't in the |
| 7 |
> > list either; I thought it would be. Java herd is struggling with |
| 8 |
> > the regular VM packages enough as it is, we could really do without |
| 9 |
> > supporting this one as well. I very much doubt that end users need |
| 10 |
> > it any more. Any objections to removing it? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474464#c5 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I don't really want to touch Java stuff, so I'd prefer if you handled |
| 15 |
> that yourself. That said, feel free to add it to the same p.mask |
| 16 |
> entry. Just make sure not to break the dependency graph :). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Okay. It'll also mean killing off sun-j2me-bin and proguard, which we |
| 19 |
seem to be cool with (very dead), and getting novell-groupwise-client to |
| 20 |
always use the bundled JRE. I need dilfridge's input on the latter. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives