| 1 |
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:14:17PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> Is there anything in particular in the spec/proposal for DEPENDENCIES |
| 3 |
> that would exclude the addition of individual "build: app-cat/myatom" |
| 4 |
> "run: app-cat/myatom" deps by an eclass or eclasses? I know the |
| 5 |
> "goal" here is to make things atom-centric, but I can't see an |
| 6 |
> implementation ever working of this that wouldn't permit the "pile-on" |
| 7 |
> of additional entries of different (or even the same) roles on |
| 8 |
> identical or near-identical atoms. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
They could be piled on; it would require each eclass to reset the |
| 11 |
label for safety reasons though; same goes for ebuilds frankly (or the |
| 12 |
PM would have to reset the context to build+run: each time through). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Pardon if addressed elsewhere; this thread is a fucking mess... |
| 15 |
~harring |
Archives