| 1 |
Hi Alexis, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> you did it the correct way but that's what happens when you're alone in a |
| 4 |
> team and are moving without reliable internet connection then emails & |
| 5 |
> other stuff start to pile up :/ |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'm sorry, I did not want to be pushy in any way... :| |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> > * dev-tex/achemso(-1.0) should be masked and then removed, since |
| 10 |
> > texlive-2009 contains already version 3.3. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Feel free to last rite it; or better: step up as a maintainer and bump it |
| 13 |
> so that you'll be sure to always have the greatest version and don't |
| 14 |
> depend on texlive's yearly releases :) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Lastrite is probably better in this case. Not much has changed recently and |
| 17 |
texlive is current afaik. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> (and even better: join tex herd if you're interested in doing such bumps) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Done, also tex@g.o. (Gimme more Bugzilla mails...) :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> > * I'd like to move dev-tex/revtex-4.1_p2 and its dependency dev- |
| 24 |
> > tex/natbib-8.31a from the sci overlay |
| 25 |
> > Would it be OK with you if I do any of this? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> yes though if its in texlive I usually want to remove them from the |
| 28 |
> texlive's bundle |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I see the separate ebuilds more as a temporary workaround for the few really |
| 31 |
needing bleeding edge... and will happily remove them again when texlive-2011 |
| 32 |
is out. The natbib ebuild might even become obsolete with texlive-2010 |
| 33 |
already, have not checked yet. I think most people will be happy with the |
| 34 |
texlive version, so we should keep it for simplicity. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Thanks for the tips with the ebuilds; I'll go ahead in the next days. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Best, Andreas |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 44 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 45 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 46 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives