Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:37:48
Message-Id: robbat2-20130220T213153-292325133Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies by Luis Ressel
1 On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:38:38PM +0100, Luis Ressel wrote:
2 > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:27:46 +0000
3 > "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
4 > > 3. Dedicated Gentoo signing subkey
5 > What's the point of this, btw?
6 Ideally keeping your primary key offline to increase security.
7
8 However, the original theory was that if there was some attack that
9 required a large amount of ciphertext or a targeted plaintext input, you
10 would be limiting the ciphertext to only gentoo-specific content, and
11 could trivially rotate the subkey without any impact on your primary
12 key.
13
14 --
15 Robin Hugh Johnson
16 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
17 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
18 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies Luis Ressel <aranea@×××××.de>