| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 11 May 2004, at 18:44, Eric Brown wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> So you're saying that GTK itself actually needs gnome-icon-theme to be |
| 8 |
> usable? If this is the case I'll just kindly ask that the GTK devs |
| 9 |
> update the INSTALL docs to mention this new dependency. If it's |
| 10 |
> really just a kind of evolution for GTK, then I have no complaints. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Anyway, icons are needed for the new GTK+ 2.4 file chooser at the very |
| 13 |
least. Look in gtk/gtkfilesystemunix.c. There are gnome icon names in |
| 14 |
there. Yes, GTK+ works without those icons, but it'll just look ugly |
| 15 |
and un-usable. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If you want a bare-minimum system, then you can inject packages all you |
| 18 |
like, thats the beauty of Gentoo. But we're here to provide some sane |
| 19 |
defaults, and providing icons with a GUI toolkit is a sane default |
| 20 |
here. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Cheers, |
| 23 |
- -- |
| 24 |
Alastair 'liquidx' Tse |
| 25 |
>> Gentoo Developer (Python/GNOME/CJK/PDA/Bluetooth) |
| 26 |
>> http://www.liquidx.net/ | http://dev.gentoo.org/~liquidx/ |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFAoeoAOM4cezkHFPYRAg1EAKCz3PL3cvdmVdmhkTn5Z0BXkRqVHwCZAa1y |
| 31 |
RLsBTxCMksKQbzEGmzMC/dM= |
| 32 |
=/U2B |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives