| 1 |
Pardon me if i'm missing the point.. but would something like: |
| 2 |
[1]dsh -a emerge -ku sendmail |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
be usefull in this type of situation? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Assuming of course you had a server with the binarys (i486 or whatever |
| 7 |
is most suitable) avaialble by ftp or something |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
You could prolly do this over ssh forwarding, or stunnel too so all |
| 10 |
transactions were secure. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
[1] dsh (1) - Distributed shell, or dancer's shell |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:31, Steven Elling wrote: |
| 15 |
> On Sunday 31 August 2003 13:14, John Nilsson wrote: |
| 16 |
> > Some requirement thoughts: |
| 17 |
> > A network of gentoo hosts should have only one portage processing server |
| 18 |
> > and any number of installation leafs. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > First of all portage needs to easily handle more than one installation. |
| 21 |
> > Second the "leaf-installations" should have a very strict minimum |
| 22 |
> > requiremnts. |
| 23 |
> > Third redundancy is probably important. The information to restore a |
| 24 |
> > lost "leaf" should be availible on booth the portage host and on the |
| 25 |
> > leaf it self. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I'm not familar with cfengine but can it be adapted to perform this or |
| 28 |
> something similar? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives