Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Joshua Pollak <pardsbane@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-ebuild@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-ebuild] Ebuild integration / ignoring
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:34:15
Message-Id: 20011127152742.A14364@atelier.offthehill.net
1 I was going to suggest PEST, unrecoverable.org. A new version just
2 came out today, and the demo (unrecoverable.org/demo) looks pretty good.
3 I'm not a member of gentoo-dev, but I'll subscribe right now.
4
5 On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:23:29PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
6 > Hi,
7 >
8 > This has been brought up before, and as I understand someone objected to
9 > bugzilla, which was suggested by Hallski and others. We should make this a
10 > discussion on gentoo-dev and get a general agreement and drobbins' approval
11 > before actually doing anything.
12 >
13 > --
14 >
15 > Dan Armak
16 > Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
17 > Matan, Israel
18 > _______________________________________________
19 > gentoo-ebuild mailing list
20 > gentoo-ebuild@g.o
21 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-ebuild

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild integration / ignoring Bart Verwilst <verwilst@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-ebuild] Ebuild integration / ignoring Karl Trygve Kalleberg <karltk@×××××××.no>