| 1 |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:16:53 -0300 |
| 2 |
Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:12:40 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > > > > > > > > to some extent, can't you do the same by unpacking |
| 8 |
> > > > > > > > > twice to different $S and calling |
| 9 |
> > > > > > > > > src_prepare/compile/install instead of their |
| 10 |
> > > > > > > > > autotools-utils counterpart with tweaked $S so that it |
| 11 |
> > > > > > > > > works with almost every ebuild ? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> [...] |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > Ebuilds don't offer me anything if I have to rewrite phase functions |
| 16 |
> > anyway... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> what, in the above quote, makes you think you need to rewrite anything ? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
1. If ebuild has phase functions, they override the eclass. |
| 21 |
2. If eclass exports phase functions, they have no way of calling |
| 22 |
'previous' eclass phase functions. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Best regards, |
| 26 |
Michał Górny |
Archives