Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:08:55
Message-Id: 505ED152.7000607@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds. by Matt Turner
1 Matt Turner schrieb:
2 > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3 >> It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
4 >> packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
5 >
6 > Thanks a lot, Michał! This looks good to me.
7 >
8 >> Use case: xorg packages, ask Matt.
9 >
10 > So the idea is that users want up-to-date 32-bit drivers for games and
11 > WINE. The emul- packages aren't a very good solution for a number of
12 > reasons.
13 >
14 > I'd like to add multilib USE flags to Mesa and thus its dependencies.
15 > I realized that almost everything in x11-libs/ could be converted very
16 > easily, which would allow us to get rid of emul-linux-x86-xlibs in
17 > addition to emul-linux-x86-opengl.
18 >
19 >
20
21 This looks like a shortened duplication of a subset of multilib-portage
22 features. While this wont hurt multilib-portage (since it does exclude
23 most actions on ebuilds with USE=multilib), it will mean a rewrite for
24 many ebuilds, which then again need another rewrite (or more likely
25 revert), when multilib-portage is accepted in a future EAPI.
26
27 So i would prefer some help/support with multilib-portage to get it
28 accepted sooner, instead of this additional workaround for a subset of
29 packages.
30
31 P.S.: I know, that users, who want up-to-date 32bit drivers for games
32 and wine do use multilib-portage, so we already have a working solution
33 for this issue.
34
35 --
36
37 Thomas Sachau
38 Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies