| 1 |
On 18-07-18 11:28:16, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:26 AM, Matthew Thode |
| 3 |
> <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 18-07-18 09:16:07, Johannes Huber wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Hi all, |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> english is not my mother language, so please clarify what bup means, just |
| 8 |
> >> seen here: |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ee0e0401478cf30b3ced0405f6b89391e05d2397 |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Just checked if it was a typo, but can't be: |
| 13 |
> >> git log --oneline --grep bup | count -l |
| 14 |
> >> Expected 0 lines, got 1248. |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > It's similiar to a sound you make when you touch something's nose. |
| 18 |
> > *boop* |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > I just prefer bup instead. I generally only use it when doing simple |
| 21 |
> > bumps of packages (copy ebuilds with only keyword edits). |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> My preference is to mention the version being added when committing a |
| 24 |
> version bump. eg. "cat/pkg: bump to x.y.z". |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Yes, it does take a few more seconds, but I think it is worth the effort. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I think more recently I've been following this format. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
cat/pkg: x.y.z bup |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives